Friday, January 4, 2013

Reflections on the Eve of In Solidarity! IDLE NO MORE! The Oakland RoundDance FlashMob


"A great many people in North America believed that Canada and the US, in a moment of inexplicable generosity, gave treaty rights to Native people as a gift. Of course, anyone familiar with the history of Indians in North America knows that Native people paid for every treaty right, and in some cases, paid more than once. The idea that either country gave First Nations something for free is horseshit." Thomas King (Cherokee)
In 2007, four nations voted against the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. While all four have since changed their votes, all four have maintained their fundamental opposition to indigenous rights.

The evidence of this opposition in Canada is exhaustive.

Many First Nation people have likened Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his administration’s attitudes and efforts to previous ones more conventionally understood as “anti-Indian” (the infamous 1969 “white paper” issued Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and Jean Chrétien, Minister of Indian Affairs, proposing the termination of First Nation legal status and rights in Canada).

Harper and the Parliament have adopted and have proposed numerous amendments and laws that undermine First Nation rights and include the violation of treaties that provide for consultation on matters pertaining to reserve land and resource management. These include:
  • Bill C-38: A 450-page bill that amended over 70 acts that fundamentally changes federal oversight of water, fish, and environmental protections (passed June 2012)
  • Bill S-8: Overrides First Nation laws that protect safe drinking water (passed June 2012)
  • Bill C-45: A 450-page bill that amends 44 acts that removes fish habitat protections, recognition of First Nation commercial fisheries, and removes protections of 99% of Canada’s waterways for navigation and environmental assessment purposes (passed December 2012)
  • Bill C-428: Provides for sweeping changes to the Indian Act (proposed)
  • Bill S-207: Will annul or destroy many First Nation treaty provisions (proposed)
Bill C-38, S-8, and C-45 deregulate federal oversight of water, fish, and environmental protections in Canada, including those on First Nation reserves. Bill C-45 amends the Indian Act (allowing First Nations to sell and lease reserve lands by greatly lowering the threshold required for a majority referendum), the Navigable Waters Protection Act, the Fisheries Act, and the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act. Canada is estimated to contain nearly 32,000 lakes and 2.25 million rivers. Bill C-45 reduces federal oversight to cover only 97 lakes and portions of 62 rivers.

The deregulation of these lands and waterways is intimately connected to the proposed paths of multiple pipeline and tar sands projects in Canada. And this is where we learn the why. Deregulation aims at corporate development.

As reported by financialpost.com: “The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers’ latest forecast shows oil sands output will more than double to 3.1 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2020, from 1.6 million bpd in 2011. By 2025, production from the oil sands will soar to 4.2 million bpd by 2025 and cross the five million bpd mark by 2030. “If the only projects to proceed were the ones in operation or currently under construction, oil sands production would still increase by 54% to 2.5 million bpd by 2020 and then remain relatively flat for the rest of the forecast,” CAPP said in its 2012 annual forecast. The association estimates the country’s overall crude production to reach 6.24 million bpd by 2030."



This is why so many of Idle No More actions have involved blockades of proposed and existing pipeline constructions. Many feel that Bill C-45 is aimed at expediting these projects.

A situation that is only exacerbated by already existing financial destitution and environmental destruction of First Nation communities throughout Canada. A situation represented most profoundly by Chief Theresa Spence’s hunger strike.

Chief Spence, of the Attawapiskat First Nation, represents a remote Cree community from James Bay, Ontario. They, along with neighboring First Nations, have seen the exponential destruction of their lands and waterways by DeBeers, the largest mining company in the world whose activities have diverted public funds for transportation and housing and overwhelmed local sewage systems. The Attawapiskat’s modest federal funding and revenue shares havenot been translated into a significant improvement of social or physicalinfrastructure or qualify of life on the reserve: many people still live intents without electricity or running water.

So, to Harper’s rash of anti-First Nation measures—to deregulate so as to free up industry’s unfettered access to and exploitation of reserve lands and resources—Chief Spence and so many others have said enough is enough. Enough with the celebrated deregulatory growth of imperialist capitalism and its extraction of human and non-human life. Enough with the empire’s pretense to affirming indigenous human rights it has reduced to commercial jingles for its multicultural democracy. Enough with the refusals to sit at the table with First Nation people and enough with pretending that that is enough.

A Prayer, Of Sorts

I hear First Nation women – Theresa Spence, Nina Wilson, Sylvia McAdam, Jessica Gordon, Sheelah McLean, Ta'Kaiya Blaney– saying enough is enough and asking for our support through prayers, songs, and dancing. I hear them asking us to make ourselves responsible, in solidarity with their efforts, in prayer, song, and dance to one another and to the lands on which we reside and the waters on whose life we depend.

I hear them asking us to stand with them not merely in their hunger strikes and flashmobs but in their prayerful deliberations over what happens next. Because the January 11 meeting will not be enough. Because the empire will not change itself of its own good will or ethical commitments to doing what is right. And because I hear First Nation women asking all of us (Native and non-Native) to prepare ourselves for the possibility that they — and the Clan Mothers and the Hereditary Chiefs that stand with them— will ask something else of us.

Are you ready? To do what comes next?



1 comment: